About
What this site is, and isn't
A free collection of self-reflection questionnaires, informal quizzes, browser tasks, puzzles, and games that you can use without an account. Evidence for a cited source does not automatically apply to this site's adaptations, translations, administration, or result wording; each implementation is described below.
Methodology by test
Each entry distinguishes the cited source from this website's implementation. A citation does not validate modified items, translations, scoring, or result claims.
- Big Five
Source or framework: IPIP-50 (Goldberg, 1992).
- Implementation
- Published item set and key; website administration and translations may differ.
- Scoring
- Descriptive pattern across dimensions.
- Significant differences
- How the test is given on this website and how it is translated differ from the published source. This site does not use norms from any population.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-BF-2026.07
- Response format
- You rate how much you agree, on a scale whose steps go in order.
- Scoring formula
- Scores are placed within the possible item-response range.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- All required responses must be complete.
- Uncertainty
- A different set of questions, or different wording, may change your scores.
- How the source is used
- This test uses published questions and published scoring rules. The way the test is given here and the way it is translated differ from the published version.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-20
- Dark Triad
Source or framework: Short Dark Triad (Jones & Paulhus, 2014).
- Implementation
- Published item set and key; website administration and translations may differ.
- Scoring
- Descriptive pattern across dimensions.
- Significant differences
- How the test is given on this website and how it is translated differ from the published source. This site does not use norms from any population.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-SD3-2026.07
- Response format
- You rate how much you agree, on a scale whose steps go in order.
- Scoring formula
- Scores are placed within the possible item-response range.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- All required responses must be complete.
- Uncertainty
- Tied and nearly tied scores are shown as they are, and no top score is chosen for you.
- How the source is used
- This test uses published questions and published scoring rules. The way the test is given here and the way it is translated differ from the published version.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-20
- Four Personality Axes
Source or framework: Myers-Briggs type framework (Briggs & Myers, 1962).
- Implementation
- Custom, site-authored, unvalidated questionnaire; cited frameworks are context only where applicable.
- Scoring
- Descriptive pattern across dimensions.
- Significant differences
- The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-MBTI-2026.07
- Response format
- You rate how much you agree, on a scale whose steps go in order.
- Scoring formula
- Each axis has its own score on a continuous scale. Tied and nearly tied scores stay uncertain.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- All required responses must be complete.
- Uncertainty
- Tied and nearly tied scores are shown as they are, and no top score is chosen for you.
- How the source is used
- Only the general framework is borrowed. The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-20
- Enneagram
Source or framework: Enneagram of Personality framework.
- Implementation
- Custom, site-authored, unvalidated questionnaire; cited frameworks are context only where applicable.
- Scoring
- Descriptive pattern across dimensions.
- Significant differences
- The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-ENNEA-2026.07
- Response format
- You rate how much you agree, on a scale whose steps go in order.
- Scoring formula
- Scores are placed within the possible item-response range.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- All required responses must be complete.
- Uncertainty
- Tied and nearly tied scores are shown as they are, and no top score is chosen for you.
- How the source is used
- Only the general framework is borrowed. The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-20
- Attachment Style Profiler
Source or framework: Adult four-category attachment model (Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991); custom items and scoring.
- Implementation
- Custom, site-authored, unvalidated questionnaire; cited frameworks are context only where applicable.
- Scoring
- Descriptive pattern across dimensions.
- Significant differences
- The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-ATTACH-v2
- Response format
- You rate how much you agree, on a scale whose steps go in order.
- Scoring formula
- Each axis has its own score on a continuous scale. Tied and nearly tied scores stay uncertain.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- All required responses must be complete.
- Uncertainty
- A different set of questions, or different wording, may change your scores.
- How the source is used
- Only the general framework is borrowed. The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-28
- Career Interest Profiler (RIASEC)
Source or framework: Holland's RIASEC vocational-interest framework (Holland, 1997); custom items and scoring.
- Implementation
- Custom, site-authored, unvalidated questionnaire; cited frameworks are context only where applicable.
- Scoring
- Descriptive pattern across dimensions.
- Significant differences
- The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-RIASEC-v1
- Response format
- Self-report questions.
- Scoring formula
- Scores are placed within the possible item-response range.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- All required responses must be complete.
- Uncertainty
- A different set of questions, or different wording, may change your scores.
- How the source is used
- Only the general framework is borrowed. The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-28
- Shadow Self Reflection
Source or framework: Jung's shadow concept in analytical psychology (Jung, CW 9ii); custom reflective themes, items, and scoring.
- Implementation
- Custom, site-authored, unvalidated questionnaire; cited frameworks are context only where applicable.
- Scoring
- Descriptive pattern across dimensions.
- Significant differences
- The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-SHADOW-v1
- Response format
- You rate how much you agree, on a scale whose steps go in order.
- Scoring formula
- Scores are placed within the possible item-response range.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- All required responses must be complete.
- Uncertainty
- A different set of questions, or different wording, may change your scores.
- How the source is used
- Only the general framework is borrowed. The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-28
- Moral Foundations & Core Values
Source or framework: Moral Foundations Theory (Graham, Haidt, & Nosek, 2009) and liberty-focused extension (Iyer et al., 2012); custom items and scoring.
- Implementation
- Custom, site-authored, unvalidated questionnaire; cited frameworks are context only where applicable.
- Scoring
- Descriptive pattern across dimensions.
- Significant differences
- The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-MF6-v1
- Response format
- You rate how much you agree, on a scale whose steps go in order.
- Scoring formula
- Scores are placed within the possible item-response range.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- All required responses must be complete.
- Uncertainty
- A different set of questions, or different wording, may change your scores.
- How the source is used
- Only the general framework is borrowed. The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-28
- Conflict Response Styles
Source or framework: Two-dimensional conflict-handling framework (Ruble & Thomas, 1976; Thomas, 1992); custom items and scoring, not the TKI.
- Implementation
- Custom, site-authored, unvalidated questionnaire; cited frameworks are context only where applicable.
- Scoring
- Descriptive pattern across dimensions.
- Significant differences
- The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-CONFLICT-v1
- Response format
- You rate how much you agree, on a scale whose steps go in order.
- Scoring formula
- Scores are placed within the possible item-response range.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- All required responses must be complete.
- Uncertainty
- Positively framed self-report items, social desirability, and response style can influence the profile.
- How the source is used
- Only the general framework is borrowed. The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-28
- Sensory & Environmental Sensitivity
Source or framework: Sensory Processing Sensitivity and environmental-sensitivity research (Aron & Aron, 1997; Greven et al., 2019; Pluess et al., 2026); custom reflective lenses, items, and scoring—not the HSPS, HSP Scale, SPSQ, or HSP-R.
- Implementation
- Custom, site-authored, unvalidated questionnaire; cited frameworks are context only where applicable.
- Scoring
- Descriptive pattern across dimensions.
- Significant differences
- The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-SENS-v1
- Response format
- You rate how much you agree, on a scale whose steps go in order.
- Scoring formula
- Scores are placed within the possible item-response range.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- All required responses must be complete.
- Uncertainty
- Positively framed self-report items, social desirability, and response style can influence the profile.
- How the source is used
- Only the general framework is borrowed. The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-28
- Control Beliefs & Self-Efficacy Reflection
Source or framework: Control-belief and self-efficacy frameworks (Rotter, 1966; Levenson, 1973; Bandura, 2006; Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1995); custom reflective lenses, items, and scoring—not the Rotter I–E Scale, Levenson IPC Scales, GSE, or NGSE.
- Implementation
- Custom, site-authored, unvalidated questionnaire; cited frameworks are context only where applicable.
- Scoring
- Descriptive pattern across dimensions.
- Significant differences
- The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-LOC-v1
- Response format
- You rate how much you agree, on a scale whose steps go in order.
- Scoring formula
- Scores are placed within the possible item-response range.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- All required responses must be complete.
- Uncertainty
- Positively framed self-report items, social desirability, and response style can influence the profile.
- How the source is used
- Only the general framework is borrowed. The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-28
- Empathizing and Systemizing
Source or framework: Empathy Quotient (Baron-Cohen & Wheelwright, 2004) and Systemizing Quotient–Revised (Wheelwright et al., 2006); locally selected/adapted items and custom scoring.
- Implementation
- Materially adapted from the cited task; source validity does not transfer automatically.
- Scoring
- Descriptive pattern across dimensions.
- Significant differences
- The local form is shortened or materially changed from the cited source.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-ES-2026.07
- Response format
- You rate how much you agree, on a scale whose steps go in order.
- Scoring formula
- Each axis has its own score on a continuous scale. Tied and nearly tied scores stay uncertain.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- All required responses must be complete.
- Uncertainty
- A different set of questions, or different wording, may change your scores.
- How the source is used
- This test uses published questions and published scoring rules. The way the test is given here and the way it is translated differ from the published version.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-30
- Daily Rhythm & Energy Reflection
Source or framework: Morningness–Eveningness preference literature (Horne & Östberg, 1976) and two-process sleep regulation (Borbély et al., 2016) provide context only; custom items, direct ratings, and scoring, not the MEQ or MCTQ.
- Implementation
- Custom, site-authored, unvalidated questionnaire; cited frameworks are context only where applicable.
- Scoring
- Descriptive pattern across dimensions.
- Significant differences
- The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-CHRONO-v2
- Response format
- Self-report questions.
- Scoring formula
- Scores are placed within the possible item-response range.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- All required responses must be complete.
- Uncertainty
- Positively framed self-report items, social desirability, and response style can influence the profile.
- How the source is used
- Only the general framework is borrowed. The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-28
- Two-Axis Political Views
Source or framework: ThinkTraits.
- Implementation
- Custom, site-authored, unvalidated questionnaire; cited frameworks are context only where applicable.
- Scoring
- Descriptive pattern across dimensions.
- Significant differences
- The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-POL-2026.07
- Response format
- You rate how much you agree, on a scale whose steps go in order.
- Scoring formula
- Each axis has its own score on a continuous scale. Tied and nearly tied scores stay uncertain.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- All required responses must be complete.
- Uncertainty
- Tied and nearly tied scores are shown as they are, and no top score is chosen for you.
- How the source is used
- Task, items, and scoring are authored for this site.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-20
- Fictional Moral Alignment
Source or framework: Dungeons & Dragons alignment framework.
- Implementation
- Fictional or popular framework used for entertainment.
- Scoring
- Descriptive pattern across dimensions.
- Significant differences
- A local adaptation of a fictional or popular framework.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-DND-2026.07
- Response format
- You rate how much you agree, on a scale whose steps go in order.
- Scoring formula
- Descriptive fictional or popular-framework profile.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- All required responses must be complete.
- Uncertainty
- Tied and nearly tied scores are shown as they are, and no top score is chosen for you.
- How the source is used
- Only the general framework is borrowed. The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-20
- DISC
Source or framework: DISC — Marston (1928).
- Implementation
- Custom, site-authored, unvalidated questionnaire; cited frameworks are context only where applicable.
- Scoring
- Descriptive pattern across dimensions.
- Significant differences
- The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-DISC-2026.07
- Response format
- You rate how much you agree, on a scale whose steps go in order.
- Scoring formula
- Scores are placed within the possible item-response range.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- All required responses must be complete.
- Uncertainty
- Positively framed self-report items, social desirability, and response style can influence the profile.
- How the source is used
- Only the general framework is borrowed. The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-20
- Love Languages
Source or framework: Five Love Languages framework (Chapman, 1992).
- Implementation
- Custom, site-authored, unvalidated questionnaire; cited frameworks are context only where applicable.
- Scoring
- Descriptive pattern across dimensions.
- Significant differences
- The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-LOVE-2026.07
- Response format
- You rate how much you agree, on a scale whose steps go in order.
- Scoring formula
- Scores are placed within the possible item-response range.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- All required responses must be complete.
- Uncertainty
- Positively framed self-report items, social desirability, and response style can influence the profile.
- How the source is used
- Only the general framework is borrowed. The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-20
- Emotional Skills
Source or framework: ThinkTraits.
- Implementation
- Custom, site-authored, unvalidated questionnaire; cited frameworks are context only where applicable.
- Scoring
- Descriptive pattern across dimensions.
- Significant differences
- The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-EMOTION-2026.07
- Response format
- You rate how much you agree, on a scale whose steps go in order.
- Scoring formula
- Scores are placed within the possible item-response range.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- All required responses must be complete.
- Uncertainty
- Positively framed self-report items, social desirability, and response style can influence the profile.
- How the source is used
- Task, items, and scoring are authored for this site.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-20
- Cognitive Bias & Decision Safeguards
Source or framework: Cognitive-bias research (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974, 1981; Arkes & Blumer, 1985) and bias-blind-spot research (Pronin, Lin, & Ross, 2002; Scopelliti et al., 2015); custom self-report items and scoring.
- Implementation
- Custom, site-authored, unvalidated questionnaire; cited frameworks are context only where applicable.
- Scoring
- Descriptive pattern across dimensions.
- Significant differences
- The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-CBIAS-v1
- Response format
- You rate how much you agree, on a scale whose steps go in order.
- Scoring formula
- Scores are placed within the possible item-response range.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- All required responses must be complete.
- Uncertainty
- Positively framed self-report items, social desirability, and response style can influence the profile.
- How the source is used
- Only the general framework is borrowed. The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-28
- Abstract Reasoning Quiz
Source or framework: ThinkTraits.
- Implementation
- Custom, site-authored, unvalidated questionnaire; cited frameworks are context only where applicable.
- Scoring
- Raw correct/total or self-report total.
- Significant differences
- The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-AR-2026.07
- Response format
- Choose one answer from listed options.
- Scoring formula
- The number of correct answers out of the total shown.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- All required responses must be complete.
- Uncertainty
- A different set of questions, or different wording, may change your scores.
- How the source is used
- Task, items, and scoring are authored for this site.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-20
- Pattern Matrix Reasoning
Source or framework: Carpenter, Just, & Shell (1990); Embretson (1998).
- Implementation
- Custom, site-authored, unvalidated questionnaire; cited frameworks are context only where applicable.
- Scoring
- Raw correct/total or self-report total.
- Significant differences
- The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-PM-v1
- Response format
- Choose one answer from listed options.
- Scoring formula
- The number of correct answers out of the total shown.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- All required responses must be complete.
- Uncertainty
- A different set of questions, or different wording, may change your scores.
- How the source is used
- Task, items, and scoring are authored for this site.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-28
- Memory & Attention Activity
Source or framework: ThinkTraits.
- Implementation
- Custom, site-authored, unvalidated questionnaire; cited frameworks are context only where applicable.
- Scoring
- Raw correct/total or self-report total.
- Significant differences
- The questions and the scoring rules were written for this site.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-MEMATTN-v2
- Response format
- A mix of tasks in your browser. Some questions have right and wrong answers, some rounds are timed, and some answers you write yourself.
- Scoring formula
- The number of correct answers out of the total shown.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- All required responses must be complete.
- Uncertainty
- A different set of questions, or different wording, may change your scores.
- How the source is used
- Task, items, and scoring are authored for this site.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-20
- Activity for Matching Shapes in 3D
Source or framework: Mental rotation task (Shepard & Metzler, 1971).
- Implementation
- Materially adapted from the cited task; source validity does not transfer automatically.
- Scoring
- Raw correct/total or self-report total.
- Significant differences
- The local form is shortened or materially changed from the cited source.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-MR-2026.07
- Response format
- Choose one answer from listed options.
- Scoring formula
- The number of correct answers out of the total shown.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- All required responses must be complete.
- Uncertainty
- A different set of questions, or different wording, may change your scores.
- How the source is used
- A public task or puzzle structure is reimplemented for the browser.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-20
- Working Memory Task (2-Back)
Source or framework: N-back task (Kirchner, 1958).
- Implementation
- Custom browser performance task affected by protocol and device.
- Scoring
- Observed performance under this browser protocol.
- Significant differences
- The local browser protocol is device-dependent.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-NBACK-v2
- Response format
- Rounds in your browser where the time you take is measured.
- Scoring formula
- Balanced accuracy is the mean of the hit rate and correct-rejection rate; hits, misses, false alarms, and correct rejections are shown as supporting counts.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- If the page becomes hidden, the full run restarts.
- Uncertainty
- Device, display, browser, and input method can change the result.
- How the source is used
- A public task or puzzle structure is reimplemented for the browser.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-20
- Tower of Hanoi
Source or framework: Tower of Hanoi puzzle (Lucas, 1883).
- Implementation
- Custom browser performance task affected by protocol and device.
- Scoring
- Observed performance under this browser protocol.
- Significant differences
- The local browser protocol is device-dependent.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-HANOI-2026.07
- Response format
- Interactive browser puzzle.
- Scoring formula
- Minimum possible moves divided by moves used.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- Attempts that do not match the current rules for the task are marked as old or invalid.
- Uncertainty
- No numerical uncertainty interval is claimed.
- How the source is used
- A public task or puzzle structure is reimplemented for the browser.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-20
- Memory for Sequences of Digits
Source or framework: Forward Digit Span.
- Implementation
- Materially adapted from the cited task; source validity does not transfer automatically.
- Scoring
- Observed performance under this browser protocol.
- Significant differences
- The local form is shortened or materially changed from the cited source.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-DIGIT-v2
- Response format
- Rounds in your browser where the time you take is measured.
- Scoring formula
- The longest sequence you remembered, under the stopping rule stated here.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- Attempts that do not match the current rules for the task are marked as old or invalid.
- Uncertainty
- A different set of questions, or different wording, may change your scores.
- How the source is used
- A public task or puzzle structure is reimplemented for the browser.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-20
- Memory for Sequences of Blocks
Source or framework: Corsi block-tapping literature (Corsi, 1972).
- Implementation
- Materially adapted from the cited task; source validity does not transfer automatically.
- Scoring
- Observed performance under this browser protocol.
- Significant differences
- The local form is shortened or materially changed from the cited source.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-CORSI-v2
- Response format
- Rounds in your browser where the time you take is measured.
- Scoring formula
- The longest sequence you remembered, under the stopping rule stated here.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- Attempts that do not match the current rules for the task are marked as old or invalid.
- Uncertainty
- A different set of questions, or different wording, may change your scores.
- How the source is used
- A public task or puzzle structure is reimplemented for the browser.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-20
- Reaction Time
Source or framework: Simple visual reaction time.
- Implementation
- Custom browser performance task affected by protocol and device.
- Scoring
- Observed performance under this browser protocol.
- Significant differences
- The local browser protocol is device-dependent.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-RT-v2
- Response format
- Rounds in your browser where the time you take is measured.
- Scoring formula
- The median (the middle value) across the rounds that counted toward your score.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- The affected trial must be retried and is not scored.
- Uncertainty
- Device, display, browser, and input method can change the result.
- How the source is used
- A public task or puzzle structure is reimplemented for the browser.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-20
- Target Acquisition Task
Source or framework: ThinkTraits.
- Implementation
- Custom browser performance task affected by protocol and device.
- Scoring
- Observed performance under this browser protocol.
- Significant differences
- The local browser protocol is device-dependent.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-AIM-v4
- Response format
- Rounds in your browser where the time you take is measured.
- Scoring formula
- The arithmetic average of the times that counted for reaching a target, worked out separately for each kind of input you used. Times from the keyboard measure activating a target through the accessibility path, and they cannot be compared with reaching a target with a pointer.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- A partly shown target hidden by a visibility change is discarded and replaced without recording a hit or miss.
- Uncertainty
- Device, display, browser, and input method can change the result.
- How the source is used
- Task, items, and scoring are authored for this site.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-20
- Typing Activity
Source or framework: Soukoreff & MacKenzie (2003).
- Implementation
- Custom browser performance task affected by protocol and device.
- Scoring
- Observed performance under this browser protocol.
- Significant differences
- The local browser protocol is device-dependent.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-TYPE-v4
- Response format
- Rounds in your browser where the time you take is measured.
- Scoring formula
- Gross words per minute multiplied by Unicode grapheme-cluster accuracy.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- If the page becomes hidden, the full run restarts.
- Uncertainty
- Device, display, browser, and input method can change the result.
- How the source is used
- A public task or puzzle structure is reimplemented for the browser.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-20
- Interference Task Using Arrows
Source or framework: Eriksen flanker task (Eriksen & Eriksen, 1974).
- Implementation
- Materially adapted from the cited task; source validity does not transfer automatically.
- Scoring
- Observed performance under this browser protocol.
- Significant differences
- The local form is shortened or materially changed from the cited source.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-FLANKER-v3
- Response format
- Rounds in your browser where the time you take is measured.
- Scoring formula
- For each kind of round, this test shows how often you answered correctly and the median (the middle value) of the response times that were correct and counted. Interference is the difference between those medians.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- The affected trial is kept only as invalid timing and cannot contribute to the timing median.
- Uncertainty
- Device, display, browser, and input method can change the result.
- How the source is used
- A public task or puzzle structure is reimplemented for the browser.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-20
- Interference Task Using Colors and Words
Source or framework: Stroop interference task (Stroop, 1935).
- Implementation
- Materially adapted from the cited task; source validity does not transfer automatically.
- Scoring
- Observed performance under this browser protocol.
- Significant differences
- The local form is shortened or materially changed from the cited source.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-STROOP-v3
- Response format
- Rounds in your browser where the time you take is measured.
- Scoring formula
- For each kind of round, this test shows how often you answered correctly and the median (the middle value) of the response times that were correct and counted. Interference is the difference between those medians.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- The affected trial is kept only as invalid timing and cannot contribute to the timing median.
- Uncertainty
- Device, display, browser, and input method can change the result.
- How the source is used
- A public task or puzzle structure is reimplemented for the browser.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-20
- Color-Dot Puzzle
Source or framework: ThinkTraits.
- Implementation
- Custom browser performance task affected by protocol and device.
- Scoring
- Raw correct/total or self-report total.
- Significant differences
- The local browser protocol is device-dependent.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-COLORDOT-v2
- Response format
- Choose one answer from listed options.
- Scoring formula
- The number of correct answers out of the total shown.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- All required responses must be complete.
- Uncertainty
- Device, display, browser, and input method can change the result.
- How the source is used
- Task, items, and scoring are authored for this site.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-20
- Puzzle for Sorting Colors by Hue
Source or framework: ThinkTraits.
- Implementation
- Custom browser performance task affected by protocol and device.
- Scoring
- Observed performance under this browser protocol.
- Significant differences
- The local browser protocol is device-dependent.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-HUE-v2
- Response format
- Interactive browser puzzle.
- Scoring formula
- How far each color tile is from its correct place, squared and added up, plus the number of color tiles you can move that are in exactly the right place.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- Attempts that do not match the current rules for the task are marked as old or invalid.
- Uncertainty
- Device, display, browser, and input method can change the result.
- How the source is used
- Task, items, and scoring are authored for this site.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-20
- Time Estimation Task
Source or framework: ThinkTraits.
- Implementation
- Custom browser performance task affected by protocol and device.
- Scoring
- Observed performance under this browser protocol.
- Significant differences
- The local browser protocol is device-dependent.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-TIME-v3
- Response format
- Rounds in your browser where the time you take is measured.
- Scoring formula
- The percentage error without its direction, the error with its direction (too high or too low), and how much your answers varied from round to round.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- If the page becomes hidden, the full run restarts.
- Uncertainty
- Device, display, browser, and input method can change the result.
- How the source is used
- Task, items, and scoring are authored for this site.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-20
- Task on Differences in Musical Pitch
Source or framework: ThinkTraits.
- Implementation
- Custom browser performance task affected by protocol and device.
- Scoring
- Observed performance under this browser protocol.
- Significant differences
- The local browser protocol is device-dependent.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-PITCH-v2
- Response format
- Rounds in your browser where the time you take is measured.
- Scoring formula
- Scored counts (8 same, 8 different) across four fixed base frequencies; the eight different-pair outcomes balance upward/downward direction and determine the smallest correctly identified adaptive pitch difference.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- The affected trial must be retried and is not scored.
- Uncertainty
- Device, display, browser, and input method can change the result.
- How the source is used
- Task, items, and scoring are authored for this site.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-20
- Visual Imagery Vividness (VVIQ-style)
Source or framework: VVIQ — Marks (1973).
- Implementation
- Materially adapted from the cited task; source validity does not transfer automatically.
- Scoring
- Descriptive pattern across dimensions.
- Significant differences
- The local form is shortened or materially changed from the cited source.
- Norms
- No representative population norms; results are not percentiles.
- Intended use
- Self-reflection or task feedback only; not diagnostic.
- Version
- TT-VVIQ16-2026.07
- Response format
- Self-report questions.
- Scoring formula
- Sum of 16 self-report ratings; possible total 16–80.
- Invalid or incomplete responses
- All required responses must be complete.
- Uncertainty
- A different set of questions, or different wording, may change your scores.
- How the source is used
- This test uses published questions and published scoring rules. The way the test is given here and the way it is translated differ from the published version.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-20
Privacy
A ThinkTraits account is optional. Most tests, games, and curated experiences do not require a name, email, or sign-in. Data handling varies by feature; the notice beside an input or optional action gives the most specific information.
Browser and result URLs
New results are calculated in your browser and kept in this tab's session storage under a random ID. Their URLs contain only that ID, not answers or result data. If you are signed in and profile saving is enabled, a private account copy is also stored as described below. Save & share creates a separate public-by-link copy. Older direct result links may still contain legacy data and remain readable. On-page notices explain exceptions such as place search or AI and what those features send.
Optional accounts and sign-in
ThinkTraits accounts use Better Auth and a PostgreSQL database hosted on Railway. ThinkTraits receives an email address and, for password sign-in, the password over encrypted HTTPS; Better Auth stores only a password hash, not the plain password. Better Auth generates and verifies email codes, which Resend delivers to prove control of the mailbox. Google sign-in also involves Google and supplies ThinkTraits with a verified email and provider identifier. Matching verified Google and email identities are linked to one user. Results completed while signed in are saved to the private profile by default. Each record includes the test type, completion time, optional public-link ID, and validated payload needed to reconstruct the result; depending on the activity, that payload may include answers, scores, trial measurements, selections, derived values, or the display names entered in Love Calculator. The Profile switch stops future saving, while the Tests tab lets you revisit and delete one or all account copies. Turning saving off does not delete existing records. The Profile tab can also permanently delete the account, its sign-in methods and sessions, its preferences, and all private saved results. A separate, account-stored AI Insights switch in Profile is on by default. Turning it off blocks new signed-in AI Insights requests without affecting public AI activities elsewhere on the site or deleting the latest saved AI insight. The AI Insights page lets you delete that report separately.
AI-assisted features
Tarot, contextual I Ching and Runecasting reflections, Dream Interpretation, Past-Life Akashic’s Expand Story action, Vedic Baby Naming’s optional name brainstorm, and the signed-in AI Insights dashboard send a request through ThinkTraits’ server to Ollama Cloud. Tarot sends your consented question, card spread, and interface language. Contextual I Ching and Runecasting send your consented question, server-reconstructed cast facts, and interface language; the ordinary curated reading does not. Dream Interpretation sends your narrative, selected feeling, recurrence, context, derived symbols and themes, and interface language after you consent. Expand Story sends stable fictional story-part IDs, the locally assembled story text, and interface language—not the nickname or its hash. Vedic name brainstorming sends only the derived Nakshatra, pada, starting sound, and interface language—not the birth date, time, place, time zone, exact instant, or Moon longitude. AI Insights sends only server-derived summaries of the private results you explicitly select and the interface language, never their raw answer strings or account record IDs. Shadow & dream reflection includes privacy-safe dream category IDs but excludes the raw dream narrative and any prior generated dream prose. Relationship insight also reads the four public-by-link results you submit for the other person and sends their derived summaries; use those links only with that person’s permission. If the first model attempt fails, Ollama may process the same request with a fallback model. Do not submit secrets or another person’s personal information without permission. The account-level AI Insights switch is on by default, and every request still requires reviewing its disclosure and giving consent.
Ollama’s current policy says cloud prompt and response content is processed transiently, is not stored beyond the time needed to fulfill the request, and is not used to train models. ThinkTraits cannot enforce the provider’s practices, and its policy may change.
Account, shared, and generated results
Private profile test results are stored in the Railway PostgreSQL account database until you delete them or delete the account. ThinkTraits separately stores only the latest validated AI Insights report in that private account database; generating another replaces it, and you can delete it from AI Insights. It is not added to a saved test result, share link, or social preview. Save & share separately stores the accepted result payload—the answers, scores, trial measurements, selections, or derived values needed to reconstruct it—and a creation timestamp in Upstash Redis. When result storage is available, successful Tarot, Dream Interpretation, and Past-Life AI actions also automatically store validated generated prose, its source language, and derived reading or story data so it can reopen at a random short link, even if you never press Share. Those saved AI payloads exclude the raw Tarot question, raw dream narrative, and Past-Life nickname and hash, but generated prose may reflect the meaning of submitted context. Contextual I Ching and Runecasting reports and Vedic name-brainstorm suggestions stay only on the current page and are not added to a saved profile result, share link, or social preview. ThinkTraits does not add your raw IP address, email, or browser fingerprint to a result record.
Private-by-link access and retention
Anyone who has a Save & share or automatically generated result URL can view it; “private by link” is not account authentication or an access list. Those public-link results expire automatically within 90 days. Deleting a private profile result or the entire account does not revoke a separate public link, and there is currently no self-service control to revoke that link early. Private profile test results and the latest AI Insights report are visible only after account authentication. Test results can be listed and deleted from the Tests tab, and the latest AI insight can be deleted from the AI Insights page.
Hosting, security, and external services
Every page and API request reaches the hosting platform, Vercel, which may record technical request data such as IP address, URL and query, time, user agent, region, and status under its own retention terms. Railway hosts the PostgreSQL account database, Better Auth processes account and session requests within ThinkTraits, Resend delivers email codes, and Google processes Google sign-in. For abuse prevention, ThinkTraits creates a keyed one-way digest of a network address as a temporary rate-limit identifier, separate from saved results. Production uses Sentry for sampled error reports and performance traces; session replay and log capture are disabled, and telemetry is configured to remove URL queries and private result IDs and to omit default identity data, request bodies, and AI inputs and outputs. Cloudflare Web Analytics receives cookieless aggregate page and performance metrics; its beacon is excluded from private result and dashboard pages and does not track in-app route changes. Astrology place search sends the search words and interface language to Open-Meteo. These service providers process technical data under their own policies and retention schedules.
Data kept on your device
Your browser may keep the account session, theme and language preferences, public offline assets, and some games’ settings or progress in cookies, local storage, or a service-worker cache. Private dashboard pages are not added to the offline page cache. ThinkTraits does not set advertising cookies. Browser sync or backups may copy local data, and browser history, the clipboard, the operating-system share sheet, or a destination app may retain URLs you visit, copy, or share. Sign out to end the account session, and clear this site’s browser data and history to remove records controlled by your device.
Your choices
You can use most tests and games without an account, use the curated or on-device paths without requesting AI, skip AI Insights, enter astrology coordinates manually to avoid place search, and avoid Save & share or forwarding an automatically generated link. While signed in, you can turn off future profile saving, delete one or all stored profile test results from the Tests tab, delete the latest saved AI insight from the AI Insights page, permanently delete the account from the Profile tab, or sign out. For another privacy request or early removal of a short public result link, use the contact address below; include the account email or exact result link needed to identify the record. While signed in, you can also turn off dashboard AI Insights from Profile.
Disclaimer
No part of this app, including features such as Oracle Cards or Tarot, provides financial, investment, health, relationship, or any other professional advice. Everything here is intended solely for self-reflection and entertainment. Nothing on this site is a clinical or diagnostic instrument. If you have a genuine concern about your mental health, cognitive function, color vision, or any other topic covered here, please consult a qualified professional.
No warranty
THE SERVICE IS EXPRESSLY PROVIDED "AS IS." ThinkTraits MAKES NO WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS, IMPLIED, IN FACT OR ARISING BY OPERATION OF LAW, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NON-INFRINGEMENT AND DATA ACCURACY. ThinkTraits NEITHER REPRESENTS NOR WARRANTS THAT THE OPERATION OF THE SERVICE WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR ERROR-FREE, OR THAT ANY DEFECTS WILL BE CORRECTED. ThinkTraits DOES NOT WARRANT OR MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS REGARDING THE USE OF THE SERVICE OR THE RESULTS THEREOF, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE CORRECTNESS, ACCURACY, RELIABILITY, OR USEFULNESS OF THE SERVICE.
Contact
Questions, feedback, or a privacy request? Email us at admin@thinktraits.com